Do you rely on internal users for User Acceptance Testing (UAT)? Of course. But are they dedicated testers? No. They are busy with Business As Usual (BAU). Trying to coordinate testing schedules with teams already stretched thin is exhausting, and it ensures key test cases get missed.

Hiring an experienced QA analyst is expensive, but even an expert generalist doesn't understand banking. How much effort does your team spend explaining complex financial processes—like the intricate payment hierarchy or the exact logic of loan cycle dates—before the tester can even begin? This onboarding delay is costly, frustrating, and often results in shallow testing.

Everyone checks if the application works (positive testing). But what about when a customer tries to game the system or misuse the app (negative testing)? This is where most security and functional issues hide. Ignoring negative scenarios—which require deep financial process knowledge to predict—is how your application "goes haywire."

You won't want the failures of one application to ruin your reputation. It only takes one bad application experience—a glitch in a loan application or a failed payment transfer—to push a customer away forever.

We bypass the long, costly explanation phase. Our team is already aware of:

• Loan Origination System (LOS) flow.
• Core banking data dependencies.
• Regulatory requirements and cycle date logic.
• Payment hierarchy and calculation validation.

This domain-specific knowledge allows us to design and execute tests that truly challenge your application’s core functionality

Our higher management team acts as your test strategist. We help to design the overall testing strategy, ensuring that testing activities are not just random clicks but a structured, recorded process that covers:

• Functionality Testing: Does the application behave exactly as per product requirements?
• Usability Testing: Is the user experience great? Are there "stoppers" in the onboarding journey?
• Pilot Testing: Validating user satisfaction during controlled releases (100–500 customers).

Startup and financial institutions need to minimize fixed costs. We provide:

• Hourly Services: We provide QA services based on the hours of testing performed. This transforms your quality assurance from a fixed, high cost (hiring) into a variable cost that scales exactly with your project's needs.
• Monthly Services: For longer projects requiring sustained effort and strategic guidance.

Finding an error is just the first step. Afterwards, you have to manage to get this fixed and re-tested. We ensure every step of the QA process is recorded in detail. This documentation is crucial for efficient defect management, cross-department alignment, and compliance audit trails.

This is where our experts confirm the application's scope, environment, and specific testing needs. We discuss:

• The application (e.g., Digital Bank App, LOS module).
• The required testing phase (SIT, UAT, or UVT).
• The expected hours/duration and delivery timeline.
• The formal contract to define scope and budget.

Once the scope is clear, our team backed by senior test strategists gains access to your web or mobile application. We then execute a customized testing script focused on:

• Deep functional checks, including negative scenarios.
• Validation against specific financial regulations and internal policies.
• Cross-department user flow validation.

Testing is useless without actionable results. We provide comprehensive, detailed reports that clearly outline:

• Bugs Found: Severity and steps to reproduce.
• Process Documentation: How the QA process was recorded.
• Resolution Management: We help coordinate the findings with your development and product teams for efficient fixes and re-testing